Analyst's note: Just remember that we can NOT make this stuff up. We have enough trouble keeping up with all of it just to keep you aware.
******
SHOCKING: Obama Bankrolled Churches, Slavery, and Border Crisis
by Brandon Walker with Mad World
This is an astonishing WTH? moment for everyone. Two leaked documents have President Obama bankrolling two major church organizations after threatening them with the IRS, admitting human trafficking (slavery) with US drug gang involvement, and admitting he not only knew of the crisis and could have prevented it, but he facilitated it instead!
When we told you the government was behind the flood of illegals and what $50 million was going to buy for illegals, it was just the tip of the iceberg.
There are now two declassified documents leaked to the press, the UAC project and a leaked ICE document, that include an array of illegal activities including human trafficking, bankrolling two major church organizations, gang involvement, and facilitation of the border crisis.
I have to tip my hat to Brandon Darby for pointing out the leaked ICE document scanned in by Brietbart, and also to Eric Odom for pointing out a section of the UAC project that I had missed when I presented it a month ago.
There are some strange things going on that all point to treason at the Executive Branch level. We know about the border patrol’s stand down order, the flood of illegal immigrants, and the CDC involvement in trying to contain what one could only call biological warfare against the United States. We know of the 1% to 10% of the immigrants actually being caught that are paraded around by mainstream media as children in a humanitarian crisis. It’s the law to return these children to their parents.
First, we have the leaked ICE document. It was prepared and delivered to the Executive Branch by ICE, who in turn were given a gag order not to talk to the press. Amazingly, it was after this leaked document that they were threatened with their jobs. Not only does it provide the fact that they are not to return fire and are to conserve ammo, like a former border agent said when he warned of a large national crisis, but it also has some rather interesting quotes on the fact that these children are not running for their lives. They are being used for human trafficking. While slavery is permitted in Islam, it is not permitted in America. It also says 92% of them will be allowed to stay, violating the law on orders of DHS and the President!
Here are a few of the highlights in the opening portion:
“97 percent of Other Then Mexican (OTM) UCs encountered in FY14 are from El Salvador, Guatemala,or Honduras, a region known as the “Northern Triangle”. The remaining three percent of all OTM UCs are comprised from nationals from 43 other countries.” (If you check their footnote; yes, this includes National Security concern countries.)
“Projects a total 53,375 UCs from the “Northern Triangle” in FY14 and 95,500 in FY15 will arrive at the US SWB (South West Border).”
“Also unknown is whether and how US-based gang members who are human traffickers (slavers; ie sex trade) are involved in smuggling OTM UCs and why the RGV (Rio Grand Valley) is the preferred region of entry into the United States.”
“There is no single reason for the increase in OTM UCs migration to the United States.”
“When there is a spike in OTM UC migration, there is also a spike in adult migrants from these countries. “
You can’t make this stuff up. That is in the first few paragraphs. The document is available for download.
Although it is extremely illegal, it also states that a lack of opportunity and poor economy can be used as a reason to keep 92% of them. No matter what law enforcement branch apprehends these ‘children’, they must be turned over to DHS in 72 hours. It also talks about the Mexico-Guatemala pact Obama praised, even though it is a direct violation of NAFTA.
Then again, so is shooting at our agents.
It has human trafficking information, coordinates, and suppliers all being facilitated with our refusal to do something about it under Presidential orders!
In the UAC project, things get even more messed up. We all remember what started the 2012 IRS scandal that is still being heard in Congress. The IRS turned out over 12,000 letters to churches warning them if they said anything in the pulpit about the Obama Administration they would remove their tax exempt status and audit them. It turns out there was more than that.
Two organizations in Texas were being bankrolled by Obama to participate in the illegal alien smuggling and transportation scandal. The Catholic Church and Baptist Child & Family Services received huge payouts from the taxpayers for their silence and participation as far back as 2010.
Between Dec 2010 and Nov 2013, the Catholic Charities Diocese of Galveston received $15,549,078 in federal grants from Health & Human Services for “Unaccompanied Alien Children Project” with a program description of “Refugee and Entry Assistance.”
Last year, the Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth received $350,000 from Department of Homeland Security for “citizenship and education training” with a program description of “citizenship and immigration services.”
Between September 2010 and September 2013, the Catholic Charities of Dallas received $823,658 from the Department of Homeland Security for “Citizenship Education Training” for “refugee and entrant assistance.”
From Dec 2012 to January 2014, Baptist Child & Family Services received $62,111,126 in federal grants from Health & Human Services for “Unaccompanied Alien Children Program.” ~Liberty News
It’s all in the UAC project documentation.
Now you know where the $50 million to buy a luxury hotel to house illegals was coming from. You, the taxpayer, was on the hook for housing these illegals through BCFS and the Catholic Church. They weren’t just paying for transportation after all.
There is more then enough evidence here alone to add to the “phony scandal” list that grows every day against Barack Obama. Nixon wiretapped a hotel. This President has violated ever oath of office and committed treason.
We need to demand justice. Spread this as far as you can and contact your Senator, your House Representative, and your governor today.
******
Illegal Immigrants Forcibly Occupy Small Texas Town
in National Report (about 2 weeks ago)
(Sarita, Texas) – The Mexican border crisis has gone from bad to worse over night after a well-organized Hispanic militia sacked the small town of Sarita, Texas. Sarita is a quiet community, residing 90 miles west of the Gulf of Mexico. The city limits stretch for two miles along U.S. Route 77, and ending before Kingsville. The 2010 US Census states that the berg has a mere 284 residents.
Sarita, TX has been recognized in the past for its leftist views. Business Insider ranked them “The Most Liberal City In Texas“. Some immigrants are said to have used this to their advantage, crossing the nearby border in the belief that Saritains would not report them to the Border Patrol. This tolerant mentality has proven to be a double edge sword, however, and one that could served to be their undoing.
Late Thursday night, over one hundred armed La Raza militants stormed the sparely populated town, forcing the original residents out and claiming the abandoned properties as their own. The potential death toll is unknown at this time, though several members of the community are
According To The 2010 US Census Sarita Texas Has A Population Of 284
Local law enforcement agents are critically shorthanded; Their efforts spread thin in an attempt to secure their native towns from the current influx of illegal aliens. For the last two weeks, thousands of these immigrants have infiltrated America’s border. US authorities are out-manned, and out-gunned by the lawless Mexican gang, who are said to be carrying military grade firepower. In short, American soil has been captured by a foreign militia, and absolutely nothing is being done to reclaim it.
Corpus Christi Police Detective, Joshua Herberger, works on the city’s gang enforcement unit and gave us his own theory of La Raza’s motives. “I believe that this group is using the town to advance three primary goals. One: To smuggle drugs, prostitutes and other members of their gang into America. Two: To serve as a “raid base” from which they can spread out further into the surrounding areas, and three: Pillaging the community’s resources to sustain these various operations. If they are not removed soon, it will become exponentially more difficult to evict them in the near future.”
Residents are angered that the United States is doing nothing to help them reclaim their homes, and are demanding action through local news organizations.
“They Shouted “Viva La Raza!” While Marching Through Our Neighborhood. There Must Have Been More Than 100 Of Them, All Carrying AK-47s, And Wearing Masks…”
In an interview with National Report, John Terrance, a lifelong resident of Sarita, told us the following, “Me and my wife are in our bedroom sleeping, right, and we were woken up by gun shots and loud yelling. You could hear a mob outside on the street, all speaking Spanish. They shouted “Viva La Raza!” while marching through our neighborhood. There must have been more than 100 of them, all carrying AK-47s, and wearing masks. Real scary looking guys. Groups of them started breaking into the houses on my block. Three of them raided our house as well. Told my wife and I to walk out to the street while holding us at gun point. Everyone was still in their pajamas, totally defenseless. A handful of the gang members then walked the lot of us to the edge of town. That’s when the one of them said, ” Let your President know that we are reclaiming what is rightfully ours. Sarita belongs to La Raza.” It was the most frightened I’d ever been in my life. I was so sure we were going to die last night…”
When questioned about any other casualties, Terrance told us ,”I’m not sure. There were lots of gun shots, and several of my neighbors are still missing. I fear the worse, though I didn’t see anyone physically die.”
According to John and his wife, Gladys, many of Sarita’s citizens are staying with relatives in the neighboring towns of Kingsville and Falfurrias. They are all on edge, wondering which city will fall victim the La Raza militants next. “We’ve had to leave everything behind.” Says Gladys. “These criminals have taken our homes, doing God knows what in them, and no one, not even Obama–a man we voted for–wants to take action. I tell you, this is a sad time to be an American…”
UPDATE 7-12-14: FEDs Issue Media Gag Order – Sarita, Texas; La Raza Invasion Continues
UPDATE 7-13-14: Day Three Of The Sarita Texas Invasion: La Raza Militant Leader Speaks
******
Obama Threatens Governors
at Best of Cain
Hardly a surprise: During a recent meeting with the nation's governors, President Obama made clear his top priority, which is to make sure that the governors don't go talking out of turn or criticizing his policies in any way. Texas Gov. Rick Perry saw no reason to keep this a secret, and as you can see here, he didn't:
Seriously, "You'll hear from me"?
Does Obama seriously think governors are going to cower in their boots because he reminds them of his ominous presence? [....]
From ‘My People’ to ‘Our People’ — What Next?
Via WRSA
Representative Luis Gutierrez addressed the National Council of La Raza in hyper tones, calling not only for more amnesties but also for the crowd to “punish” their adversaries who would oppose them.
Apparently, Eric Holder’s prior separatist reference to “my people” when talking of African Americans, and President Obama’s earlier 2010 racialist call for Latinos “to punish our enemies” have filtered down as mainstream nomenclature and emboldened others. But how strange that “raza,” “my people,” and “our people” are now politically correct words in a linguistically sensitive age when referents like the Washington “Redskins” or “illegal” immigrants are considered racially insensitive.
Gutierrez might stop for a second, and ask what the logical trajectory is of a multiracial America in which particular ethnic groups refer to themselves as “our” or “my” people — would not the corollary be that those Americans outside the proper ethnic circle would be “not our people” or “not my people”?
******
Forgive me for not taking lectures on national security from traitors like Snowden and Assange (or their Guardian fan club)
by Max Hastings (MailOnline - UK)
Edward Snowden is a weedy-looking 31-year-old American computer geek with a beard that appears to be suffering from a nitrogen deficiency.
He is also a darling of the Left, sharing with Julian Assange of WikiLeaks the distinction of having wreaked havoc among the West’s intelligence services by disclosures of their operations: in Snowden’s case, of a mass of surveillance material collected while working for the U.S. National Security Agency.
Now from Moscow, the citadel of freedoms where Snowden enjoys asylum, he has granted an interview to his principal fan magazine, the Guardian, denouncing Britain’s new anti-terror legislation.
Quite unnecessary, he says: ‘It defies belief.’ What enemies does Britain have, who need electronic surveillance? ‘I mean, we don’t have bombs falling. We don’t have U-boats in the harbour.’
It is weird that the Guardian should think Snowden’s views about anything are deserving of space.
Like Assange, he has achieved notoriety by, in effect, throwing mud pies — albeit explosive ones — at those responsible for securing the society in which he lived.
In mitigation, Snowden and his admirers point out that he revealed U.S. intelligence was eavesdropping on a huge range of people by a variety of means, some of which were illegal.
He justified his actions by saying he acted ‘to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them’.
But instead of showing the courage to stay in America and face the storm he had created, he fled first to China, then Russia.
The implicit — even explicit — message from Snowden and Assange is that the intelligence services’ claim that Western societies are threatened by mortal enemies is a lie, designed to provide cover for ever greater intrusion upon our privacy and liberty by a sinister state.A significant number of Lefties on both sides of the Atlantic believe this, and confer heroic status on these men — who, in most people’s eyes, are sordid figures.
Of course there are no U-boats sinking our ships, nor Nazi bombers attacking our cities. Times change. Today, we do not face an existential threat such as our forebears knew, from Hitler and then from the Soviet Union.
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, accompanied by Jennifer Robinson, a member of his legal team in 2011
But few sensible people doubt that extremist Muslim terrorists pose an ongoing peril to the lives and limbs of innocent people in Britain and the United States.
A dismaying number of fanatics, home-grown and foreign, are prepared to go to any lengths to inflict grief and destruction upon us. To defend society, our generation is fortunate enough not to have to fly Spitfires or spend years of our youth bearing arms.
Instead, we rely upon the intelligence services and special forces to do what was once done by armies, navies and air forces. Principally, this is because we now have to counter an enemy within.
Only yesterday, David Cameron announced expenditure of more than £1 billion on intelligence and surveillance, and such an investment is almost certainly thoroughly justified.
A friend who works in intelligence told me: ‘It’s incredibly difficult for agents to penetrate Muslim extremist groups. The only edge we have over them is electronic surveillance.
‘If we lose that, I won’t say there will automatically be another series of 7/7-type attacks in London, but it would get much harder to track the people who want to do this stuff.’
New reality: Britain now faces threats from Islamic extremists such as ISIS
Edward Snowden, and probably also his admirers at the Guardian, would counter that by saying: ‘But do you want governments to have an absolute right to listen to phone calls, log emails and check Twitter accounts?’
My own answer, as a citizen, is that the cross-party agreement for the security services and police to have extra monitoring powers is welcome if our safety is threatened.
Of course, we need democratic oversight of the intelligence services, and I would like to see this in stronger hands than those of the present pretty wet parliamentary committee.
All intelligence services contain a quota of lunatics, who periodically lose the plot.
But we live in an age in which the internet has made personal privacy almost a dead letter.
I am much more frightened by how much Google, Amazon, Tesco and myriad other companies know about me through online transaction tracking than by anything the Government might learn about me.
Traitor: Melita Norwood was exposed as having spent 40 years as a spy for the Soviet Union while working for a London firm involved in vital government research
Securing us against harm requires constant balancing of the demands of liberty and those of security.
It is hard to get this right. But in the internet age, we must concede to the intelligence services the necessary weapons to fight battles for our safety — not only against terrorists, but also against criminals, including paedophile networks.
The Left has habitually mocked the claims of governments to protect our interests, and indeed the very notion that the nation owns secrets that deserve to be protected.
In 1999, a great-grandmother called Melita Norwood was exposed as having spent 40 years as a spy for the Soviet Union while working for a London firm involved in vital government research.
Most of the media treated the story as comedy, with headlines about ‘suburban granny who spied for Moscow’.
Mrs Norwood, then 87, said in a defiant statement: ‘I did what I did not to make money, but to help prevent the defeat of a new state which had, at great cost, given ordinary people food and fares which they could afford, a good education and a health service.’
This was, of course, pernicious drivel. Even in the Fifties, no one had much excuse for failing to realise that the Soviet Union was one of history’s most bloodstained tyrannies.
Dear old Mrs Norwood, however, escaped prosecution, and I doubt if anyone even snubbed her in her local supermarket.
But this woman was considered by the KGB as the most valuable British agent they ever recruited, who as a secretary at the British Non-Ferrous Metals Research Association passed our nuclear secrets to Moscow.
Melita Norwood is dead now, but if there is an after-life, I hope she is not enjoying it, because she does not deserve to.
Norwood, like Edward Snowden and Julian Assange and their apologists, betrayed the society to which she belonged.
Snowden and Assange are not explicitly traitors — as she was, serving an evil cause — but, instead, mere anarchists.
We should never tire of responding to such people’s ravings that, for all the imperfections of Britain and the U.S., our democracies represent the higher values of mankind.
Assange lives as a fugitive in the London embassy of Ecuador, a country where he will certainly not be allowed to speak his mind, if he ever gets there.
For his part, Snowden showed himself the latest in the long line of ‘useful idiots’ so valued by Lenin, by choosing to make his ‘stand for freedom’ from the Russia of Vladimir Putin, where dissent is snuffed out and crusading journalists are routinely murdered.
It is vital that we maintain constant vigilance about the powers granted to those who protect us, especially after so many revelations of police misconduct.
Indeed, there was something unsettling about the haste last week with which the major political parties united to rush through the Government’s emergency legislation on surveillance, introduced to bypass yet another foolish judgment from the European Court of Justice against electronic surveillance.
Also, we know from experience that when politicians of different parties unite to support something, it often turns out to have been mistaken.
But when we have a choice between accepting the judgment of our Government and the intelligence services on issues of security, as opposed to those of Edward Snowden, Julian Assange and the Guardian, most of us have little difficulty about opting for the first.
The West faces an ongoing, probably epochal, peril from Muslim fanaticism. Governments need new legal powers to counter this.
Freedom can be defended only by arming ourselves to identify and undo those who labour tirelessly to undo us.
