Analyst's note: When will the United States stop funding this nest of thieves, and tyrants called the "United Nations (U.N.)?" We should certainly know better.
"I insist that if there is ANYTHING which it is the duty of the WHOLE PEOPLE to swear never to entrust to any hands but their own, that thing is the preservation and perpetuity, of their own liberties, and institutions." (Abraham Lincoln, Oct. 16, 1854, Collected Works 2:270)
"Fundamentally, I believe the ultimate purpose of our foreign policy must be to protect the liberty of the people of the United States." (Senator Robert A. Taft, A Foreign Policy for Americans, p. 11)
"The United States is founded on the concept of limited government, the U.N. concept is one of unlimited government power with virtually no meaningful restraints to protect individual liberty." (Ezra Taft Benson, An Enemy Hath Done This, p. 204)
We, of all people, should know by now that the progressives (communists) will proclaim and work for a utopian society that can only be brought about as capitalism and free enterprise are overthrown, private property abolished, the family as a social unit eliminated, all classes abolished, all governments overthrown, and a communal ownership of property in a classless, stateless society established. Is this not the goal of a one-world, progressive government?
[....] The broadening inquiry raises new concerns about the ways in which U.N. agencies have managed to sidestep restrictions that the world body expects the rest of the world to obey in halting the spread of sensitive technologies to nuclear-ambitious pariah regimes.
[....] The State Department probe came in the wake of Fox News revelations in April about the actions by WIPO in sending such sensitive equipment to North Korea by a complicated method that seemed designed to bypass U.N. Security Council sanctions against the country.The shipments took place in late 2011 or early 2012, and were financed through the Beijing offices of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP).
The WIPO actions also violated the sweeping restrictions of the equipment manufacturer, Hewlett-Packard, which forbids any HP equipment from being sent to such regimes. [....]