Analyst's note:  Absolutely must read about this tragic situation where even the Military analysis of radicalism now called 'totally objectionable'. This is thanks to the Obama administration and his association with the Muslim Brotherhood.  The American people need to stand up and speak out about such events.  Otherwise, we are a party to the resulting murders that result to American citizens .... both military and civilian .... men, women, and children.

Lawyers who are defending a military officer blasted by his commanders for teaching about the dangers of radical Islam are accusing the Pentagon of selling out to the politically correct religious perspective.

“In order to appease Muslims and the White House, Gen. Dempsey and the Department of Defense rushed to punish Lt. Col. Matt Dooley,” said Richard Thompson, chief counsel for the Thomas More Law Center.

“In the process, they violated not only our nation’s core principles of free speech and academic freedom guaranteed by our Constitution, but also, a number of the military’s own regulations dealing with academic freedom and non-attribution policies of the National Defense University…

“The violated the right to due process of law and even bypassed the university’s provost, who under NDU’s own rules has primary responsibility for adjudication of this matter.”

The dispute is over a purge of U.S. government teaching and training materials that Muslim organizations demanded, and the impact of that action on an individual instructor.

Dooley previously had been deployed in Bosnia, Kuwait and Iraq, serving as a tank platoon leader, tank company executive officer, operations officer, plans officer, small group instructor and instructor at the Joint Combined Warfare School.

[....] Text materials that were accused of being biased included Robert Spencer’s “The Truth About Mohammed: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion,” and during a Pentagon press conference with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Martin characterized Dooley’s teaching as “totally objectionable” and “against our values.”

“The result is certain,” the center said in a statement. “Officers and instructors see what has happened to Lt. Col. Dooley, and will refrain from telling the truth about Islam or confronting the difficult strategic challenges facing our nation for fear of jeopardizing their professional careers. The Pentagon has still apparently not learned from the politically correct policies that led to the Ft. Hood massacre.”

The legal team said enforcement of a political correct perspective is dangerous.

“Those people who subscribe and enforce the current environment of political correctness are the ones most often surprised by incidents like the terrorism at Ft. Hood and the uncivilized behavior currently roiling North Africa and the Middle East,” the law team said.

[....] The center said Dooley’s family was targeted by threats because of the situation.

The law firm said the case illustrates the result of “prejudicial statements” from military commanders.

“Betrayed by his military chain of command, all of whom refused to stand behind their own academic freedom and non-attribution regulations, Lt. Col. Dooley stands alone in his association with what had been previously acceptable methods of educational inquiry,” the law firm said.