Analyst's note: Absolutely must see and carefully consider. This is a very slippery slope. Can you be classified as a "domestic terrorist" because you disagree with the government? This is more of a possibility than you may think. As of this date, here is the U.S. Department of Justice definition of terrorism as promulgated in the National Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) training material:
"The unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."
What about peaceful groups that dissent from government policy ... but the government now deems their views or words to be now be "unlawful?"
We already have Mr. Obama who recently signed into law a bill that allow the Secret Service the ability to decide where Americans can and can not exercise their freedom of speech. Anywhere the SS is working (not just guarding the President, but candidates, Washington DC - where they are ever present) they can decide if you may speak out against the governments policies. The penalty? A FELONY! Jail for a year. What ever happened to America? Why would Congress (yes, even the Republican House) agree to anti-Constitutional laws? They are sworn to uphold the Constitution, not to legislate against it at will.
People, we are losing our freedom, we are losing our rights! Doesn't anyone out there care???? These people all need to be impeached or voted out or somehow restrained from violating the Supreme Law of the land. See FREE SPEECH NOW A FELONY ? Obama gives Secret Service Power to Limit Free Speech
We see more expansion of HLS to some of the "soft targets" than is meeting the general public eye. I must admit, I'm beginning to wonder what it is with this use of the term "homeland?" Are we trying to get away from using the terms our "nation" or our "United States."
How long before we will be subjected to a virtual strip search before we can buy food or other necessities? What is the bill going to be for this "protection?"
Why does our gov't continue to not name our enemy, yet we fixated on finding the "terrorist?" Yet, we know who the enemy is! Don't miss the videos embedded in this posting. Knowing that our enemy is operating inside our own gov't, I absolutely don't rule out anything. See Napolitano Announces Expansion of Gestapo Zones from Airports to Malls and Hotels and Obama Places Foreign Cops Operating Inside U.S. Above U.S. Constitution along with Even Congress Begins to Understand that Muslim Brotherhood is advising Obama
We have further progress by the Feds to turn local police into an arm of the federal gestapo. With money, gifts, and training the DHS is ingratiating themselves to our state and local police agencies. When push comes to shove we can expect the hand of Big Government to be next door now. This blurring of boundaries between federal and state law enforcement is purposeful and insidious. Everyone knows that the laws each enforce are specific to either the federal or to the State criminal code and authority does not allow one to enforce the other! Witness the commotion about Arizona trying to enforce federal immigration law. Do you want the feds to enforce and police local traffic laws, how about murder, theft, and other violations of State statute? Let it blur and see how many brown shirts we will have in our neighborhoods! There is a reason that local police are under LOCAL control.... and it needs to stay that way. See Homeland Security Uses Local Police to Set Up Surveillance Buffer Zones
The DHS, DoS & Secret Service no longer know how to vet "foreign designated terrorist organizations" OR follow the laws of this sovereign nation ... see DHS Leader: Expect more members of terrorist organizations to visit US.
We have military leadership who refused artillery support to troops engaged in a fierce battle against the enemy which left many American troops killed in Afghanistan. Military leaders have placed too many constraints on our warriors. They have implemented rules of engagement that only make sense to those working behind closed doors. See Secret genocide against American veterans
Think carefully ....
=========================================
"This power used today against an unpopular target might be used in the future by another president against a person the president doesn't like but as to whom there's no moral justification for pursuing whatsoever," Napolitano also said.
"This frivolous use of language by this administration and then claiming they have the right to use force to stop dead in their tracks the people who fit into these categories violates the principles of the Declaration of Independence and violates the supremacy of the Constitution which they've taken an oath to uphold," he said.
