Analyst's note: Absolutely must read. The Muslim Brotherhood IS OPERATING INSIDE AMERICA for the last 20 and maybe 30 years and advising our government. This now includes our direct advisory to the Obama White House, Department of Defense (DoD), FBI, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Department of State (DoS) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as well as a number of universities. They are directly shaping our national policy as well as approving and directing our government training and education on Islam both inside and outside our government. The Muslim Brotherhood’s stealthy “civilization jihad” has gained access to and influence over the United States government, with grave implications for the national security.
We have access to their documented strategy and share it here for FREE ... see the documentation and associated videos at the Muslim Brotherhood in America and Shariah the Threat to America. The Brotherhood is explicitly engaged in a “civilization jihad” in the United States, a conspiracy to “destroy the Western civilization from within.”
There actually is a direct documented tie between what recognized, mainstream authorities of Islam call “shariah” and the jihad (or holy war) it demands of adherents, some of which is manifested as terrifying violence. In addition, jihadists are engaging in non-violent – and, in some ways, far more insidious – efforts to accomplish the same goal: the supremacy of shariah worldwide under a caliph.
We can now report that criminal terror charges are now filed against Obama for direct financial support to key Muslim Brotherhood political operatives. The charge against the Obama brothers (Barack Hussein Obama and his half-brother Malik Obama) includes that they coordinated, incited and assisted the armed elements of the Muslim Brotherhood in the commission of crimes against humanity in the period from March 7 through Aug. 18, 2013 in Egypt. Would this not be Treason of the Highest Order.
Don't miss CHILLING: Muslim Brotherhood 'Inside the Wire' in America and Proof Remains That Muslim Millions Purchased The Obama Presidency Starting Way Back In 1979 .
******
Dr. Tawfik Hamid, is an Islamic thinker and reformer, and one time Islamic extremist from Egypt. He was a member of a terrorist Islamic organization JI with Dr. Ayman Al-Zawaherri who became later on the second in command of Al-Qaeda. Some twenty-five years ago, he recognized the threat of Radical Islam and the need for a reformation based upon modern peaceful interpretations of classical Islamic core texts. You can also read the "Collected Works of Tawfik Hamid: Observations on Radicalized Islam."
For several years many in the West debated if the MB is a moderate OR/ a radical group. In fact the MB managed to convince several decision makers in the US and Europe that they are their "moderate" political partner. This has contributed to accepting such a group by US decision makers despite the fact that the same group is the closest ally and share the same ideology of Hamas terrorist which is correctly classified by the US as a terrorist organization.
Several reasons contributed to the inability of many Westerns to understand the true radical nature of the MB.
First; according to the believes of the MB, they achieve their ideological goals via the following 4 sequential steps: Step 1 Al-Daawa (Preaching), Step 2 Al-Musharaka (Sharing power with others), Step 3 Al-Tamkeen (Consolidating power), Step 4 Al-Mughalab (Enforcing Sharia upon the others by force).These sequential steps simply means that an outside observer will not be able to see the violent nature of the group in the first 3 stages. In fact, the reason why most Egyptians turned against the MB they realized that the group is in stage 3 and the next step for them, or stage 4, is to be like Sharia ruled-Taliban. Had they reached stage 4 in Egypt, it would have been impossible to remove them from power. Many westerners simply could not see these stages and thus continued to support the MB in the first 3 stages thinking that they are not violent.
It worth mentioning that the MB is ready to accept things that contradicts their true ideological believes such as allowing alcohol or freedom of women dress as long as this can help them reach stage 4. Such ideological temporary sacrifice is based on the Sharia principle of Tequia (or deception of others until the person achieves power).
These stages make it more difficult to recognize their reality before they reach their final stage that shows their reality (or Stage 4).
Second, the MB has a policy of not doing the dirty work such as "terrorism" by them. They simply support other radical groups in different ways to do this job on behalf of them. The pro-terrorists agenda of the MB can be elucidated in the release of hundreds of terrorists from the prisons in Egypt (while leaving pro-democracy activists in prisons!) and also in trying to decrease international pressure on the radicals in Mali when Morsi objected to France interference against them despite their heinous crimes against their population.
.
Such an approach of not doing the violent acts themselves makes them look like a "moderate" group, however, a deeper analysis of their behaviors shows clearly that they are pro-Radicals.
Third; using unusual tactics made it more difficult for several outsiders to detect the real threat of this group. Some of these tactics include "covertly" encouraging a radical group such as Hamas organization to attack Israel and then presenting itself "overtly" as the peace negotiator to gain trust of the westerners. The ability of Hamas to reach the Israeli depth with their rockets for the first time ONLY after Morsi came to power casts doubt on the common believe that the MB was truly interested in stopping Hamas from attacking Israel.
Using words with 2 meanings is another tactic that allowed the MB to deceive many in the west. For example, many MB members can insist that it is the right of any individual to choose his religion. This is likely to be interpreted by many in the west as support for Freedom of Religion, however; the MB members will refrain from saying that "it is also the right of any individual to leave his faith" as this will contradict their basic believe in the Redda Law of Sharia which allow killing those who convert from Islam to another believe system. The use of such a tactic, allowed the MB to portray itself as a moderate group to many in the international community.
In this context it is vital to mention that, Saiid Qutb, who promoted the use of violence to enforce Islam, is still the main spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood. It is hard to believe that the MB is truly moderate while their main ideologue is the same person of the spiritual leader of Ayman Al-Zawherri. This will be like believing that a man is not anti-Semitic while his spiritual leader is Adolf Hitler! In fact, the similarity between the MB and other radical Islamic groups was elucidated when former President Naser of Egypt said in one of his speeches that the first thing that the spiritual leader of the MB asked him to do when he met with him in 1953 was to force women on wearing the Hijab. The second request was to close all movie theaters and ban movies. These are typically the first two things that Islamic radical groups from Mali to Somalia to Taliban do when they come to power.
******
The time has come to define Radical Islam. Please ask your local mosque, Islamic Shool, and Islamic organization to clearly, unambiguously and publically denounce the following concepts:
Apostates killing
Beating women and stoning women to death for adultery
Calling Jews pigs and monkeys.
Declaring war on Non Muslims to spread Islam after offering Non Muslims three options – subjugate to Islam, pay Jizia (a humiliating tax), or be killed.
Enslavement of Other Human Beings.
Fighting and killing Jews before the “End of Days”.
Gay killing.
A true moderate person or organization must be able to immediately denounce the above concepts and stand publicly and unambiguously against them.
The Muslim world must not expect the world to call Islam peaceful as long as they teach and promote the above teaching.
A clear stand is needed from leading Islamic Scholars all iover the world against the above ABCs.
Islam in Action
