Analyst's note: Absolutely must read and carefully consider. "What on earth is the President doing fraternizing with, and thereby legitimating, operatives of an organization with a seditious mission - to say nothing of the Ground Zero Mosque?" It is bad enough at any time, but does anyone in Washington remember that we are still at war with the global Islamist jihadist. I almost forgot, our federal "leaders'' no longer use such terms. Why would the "ostrich" come to mind as I draft these remarks?
We now see Obama's adherence to the principles of shariah law and the results of his Muslim upbringing during his most formative early years of life. Are these questions being asked on our evening news from our standard media? If not, why not?
Where is the outrage from our Congress? It may not be reported in Washington and by our once standard media, but I can assure you that the outrage is out here on the streets of America.
[....] Obama is willing to associate with members of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), [...] in the White House. For example, leaders of known MB front groups like Ingrid Mattson of the Islamic Society of North America and Salam al-Marayati of the Muslim Public Affairs Council were in the company at the Iftar dinner Friday when Mr. Obama fervently embraced the Ground Zero mosque.[...] we know from uncontested evidence [...] the Muslim Brotherhood's mission in America is "destroying Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions."[....] Why is the U.S. government promoting the Brotherhood's effort to penetrate our capital markets via "shariah-compliant finance," including its direct ownership of a huge player in that field, AIG? Which other shariah-adherent Muslims are getting their expenses paid by the State Department as they network around the globe on behalf of their seditious agenda? [...] Why did Team Obama cosponsor a UN resolution last Fall imposing "shariah blasphemy" laws that utterly conflict with the First Amendment's protection of free speech?
[....] Shariah is about power, not faith, [...]
